Welcome to Fitness First Sucks Mark forums read | View Forum Leaders
Fitness First Sucks



Reply
 
 
Administrator

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!StumbleUpon this Post!
Reply With Quote
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 22
07-27-2007, 08:27 PM
 
Fitness First

In a separate case, the ASA upheld a complaint about a "misleading" statement on a joining fee for gym chain Fitness First.
On the front of a leaflet for the gym it said the fee had been cut from £100 to £20.
But an asterisk next to the £20 linked to a small footnote which revealed a £30 administration fee would apply.
Fitness First denied it had tried to conceal the administration fee and claimed readers were likely to read the whole leaflet, especially when an asterisk was present.
But the ASA ruled that the front of the leaflet had implied the readers could join for £20 only.
It told the gym chain to include such information in the headline price in future.

Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3706075.stm
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11